I want to be sure that I understand the basis of the lawsuit against Amherst College.

It's all right for a male student who's been accused of sexual assault to say that he was assaulted when he was "blackout drunk"; he can win a lawsuit based on the idea that even though he doesn't remember what happened, he would never assault someone.  

A female student who says that she was assaulted while blackout drunk is just a lying alcoholic, even if she says that she would never lie about being assaulted.  

Is that an accurate summary?  

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

There is no "Trump Whisperer."

Why isn't this what the media never stops talking about?