Why can't the legislative groups meet with their executive partners now and decide what to do about Syria?

http://www.bbc.com/news/uk-politics-43792159





I think that Syria is a situation in which the criticism of bypassing process should have been secondary to the condemnation of the events there, and suddenly it wasn't.  

Sometimes, you have to take action.  If the process to take that action had been initiated months or years ago, then nobody who is against the Assad regime would be out of step.  Instead, the years of dithering have allowed Assad and his allies to proceed in the midst of everyone else's arguments about what to do.  

I know this will be a news flash for everyone:  Assad and his allies aren't dithering.  They are focussed on their bad goals, and they are winning.  

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Crazy, Slutty, Conceited Lena; thankfully, people such as Jared Leto protect everyone from her.

This picture was a joke about me, wasn't it?

This article is one of the few Google results for "North Korea" today that doesn't immediately blame President Trump for everything; it does that later, even after paragraphs that seem to prove that the problem is China.