Quentin Tarantino has spent his career proving that he loves sadistic violence, especially against women.
He is neither capable of nor interested in addressing the issue of violence in film appropriately, and his films shouldn't be financed.
Posts
How many victims of the conglomerate's promotion of voyeurism and involuntary pornography are there already, in Vermont, Massachusetts, and everywhere else that people have heard that victims of these crimes are punished for talking about it, while the perpetrators lie?
What jokes about the victims is the conglomerate going to publish this week?
Is it a coincidence that J.K. Rowling just published this Tweet?
She has yet to apologize for calling her North American school of magic "Ilvermorny," even though Vermont was the place where Quidditch was adapted from the Harry Potter books to be a sport played by nonfictional people. What will Ms. Rowling's millions of fans of all ages say, if they find out that she knew about the conglomerate's promotion of human rights abuses, from sexual harassment to voyeurism, stalking, child molestation and femicide, and not only did she never tell anyone, she victim-blamed me and condemned an entire American state to be permanently associated with her ridicule of psychiatric survivors? Have a nice billionaire day, Ms. Rowling. https://youtu.be/Hiq-pOxD324 I don't choose the addresses of videos published at YouTube.
Thank you, Judge Deborah Welsh, for making this Internet cartoon even funnier.
Hopefully, the punchline won't be a conviction for Rose McGowan, one of Harvey Weinstein's many victims, rather than for Mr. Weinstein. Advocating for due process even in the midst of institutional indifference to victims of sexual assault is not helped by judges who treat professional, ethical reporting as if it's Internet gossip. The Internet, like almost everything about people, can be destructive; however, it is also a refuge for people who have nowhere else to tell the truth and be heard.
The Internet says that Jaguar was bought by an Indian corporation in 2008.
Is that, and is the corporation's financial interest in supporting wealthy and powerful people who want to buy luxury cars, what caused the ad? January 2018: https://www.cnn.com/2018/01/30/health/india-unwanted-girls-intl/index.html Perhaps Tata Motors, which owns Jaguar, isn't as worried about criticism from women or women's groups as it is about losing wealthy clients.
Jaguar's "Impeccable Timing" ad should be investigated.
If that ad is a victim-blaming reference to a violent rape committed by Harvey Weinstein, then the ad should stop being broadcast and everyone who was part of it should be fired.